Inicio/AMD RYZEN 9 7950X3D

AMD RYZEN 9 7950X3D
Rendimiento
Caché
Gráficos integrados
Benchmarks
Funciones adicionales
the-cheapest
Desconocido
Características AMD RYZEN 9 7950X3D
Historial de precios
mín
máx
fijo
Productos con características similares
Comentarios
Virgílio Pacheco
7950x3d
7950x3d é um monstro! Muito bom!
José Luis
Un paso atrás....
Que saquen un modelo como el 7950X3D 2 años más tarde del 7900X, y que este último saque más puntuación en Cinebench, para mí es un paso atrás. Tengo no uno, si no varios 7950X3D y el Silicio de la mayoría de ellos es una porquería. Estos srs de AMD que hacen los Micros en obleas, y los del centro son los buenos, que tienen un buen Silicio, y los de las esquinas unas porquerías inestables, deberían desechar estos últimos. Para que me entiendan srs de AMD..."No se puede vender un Jamón de Jabugo salado".
DougF
Quote from: NikoB on May 20, 2023, 10:25:53 Quote from: NikoB on May 20, 2023, 10:25:53 Never, lol. It has to be close to CPU.
TypeCee
After I understood how to use it is the moste amazing experience to have it.
Dominik Bachmann
Good cpu
Good cpu sometimes problems because i havent configured it in my bios but overall pretty good.
Sonic Flipper
Ryzen 9 7950x3D>i9 14900k
This cpu may jave 8 cores less than the 14900k, but the 14900k has 16 e cores wich are useless most of the time, while only having 8 p cores. The ryzen has 16 p cores, so its better for gaming and content creation. Benchmarks dont mean everything when comparing 2 cpus. Most benchmarks are going to rate higher the 14900k just because of the e cores. I recomend the ryzen 9 oner the i9 because the am5 platform will live longer than the lga 1700 platform, and prices are low on the amd side. The price cuts are crazy.
NikoB
All these shameful L3 caches are exactly the same crutch as in cheap SSDs, where they write huge numbers of read/write speeds only within the SLC cache. As soon as the SLC cache runs out, cheap SSDs immediately drop to a level that is often worse than SATA3 max read/write speed. The situation is approximately the same with all x86, which was completely disgraced against the background of Apple's M2 Max memory controller, which is 6 times faster than AMD memory controllers and 5 times faster than Intel. As soon as this "3DCache" runs out (and today it is not even enough to keep all the key system drivers inside, not to mention software and games), any x86 processor immediately becomes about the same memory speed as a SATA3 SSD compared to 990 Pro and older. x86 is at a complete standstill, and for several years now the kernels have been suffocating from the monstrously slow RAM. Why do new processors get pci-e 5.0 28+ lines, if the top AMD processor can only serve 12-14 at a time? When will we all consumers see RAM expandable in slots with read/write speeds of at least 300Gbyte/s?
Nor Cal Nerd
Have fun parking half your cores for gaming to avoid the dreaded 3D cache studder experienced by many in benchmark's. I'm a huge AMD guy btw seriously but the 7900X3D and 7950X3D cache chip design is dreadful it's a shame!