Inicio/SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
Rendimiento
Cámara
Autonomía
Pantalla
Almacenamiento
Diseño
Características SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
TipoOLED/AMOLED
Densidad de pixeles373 ppi
Tamaño7.6 "
RAM12 GB
Capacidad1000 GB
AnTuTu964532
Capacidad4400 mAh
Descripción
El Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 es un smartphone que se destaca tanto por su funcionalidad como por su diseño innovador. Este modelo cuenta con un rendimiento competente, equipado con 12 GB de memoria RAM que facilita una experiencia de usuario fluida y eficiente.
En cuanto a la capacidad de almacenamiento, el Galaxy Z Fold4 ofrece hasta 1000 GB, lo que representa una ventaja significativa para los usuarios que necesitan guardar grandes cantidades de datos y aplicaciones sin preocupaciones de espacio.
La cámara del dispositivo proporciona una calidad satisfactoria, permitiendo capturar momentos importantes con claridad. La pantalla del Galaxy Z Fold4 es otro de sus puntos fuertes, brindando una visualización clara y nítida de contenidos multimedia y aplicaciones.
La autonomía del smartphone es satisfactoria, respaldada por una batería con capacidad de 4400 mAh que soporta un uso moderado durante el día. Además, cuenta con la funcionalidad de carga inalámbrica, lo que añade un plus de comodidad para el usuario.
Conectividad es un aspecto bien cubierto, ya que el dispositivo soporta 5G, NFC y tiene capacidad de cargar sin cables, lo que lo convierte en una opción muy adaptada a las necesidades de comunicación y transferencia de datos modernas.
El diseño del Galaxy Z Fold4 es atractivo y funcional, con una apariencia que combina elegancia y tecnología avanzada, adecuado para aquellos que valoran tanto el estilo como la sustancia en sus dispositivos móviles.
Historial de precios
mín
máx
fijo
$10,997
Entrega gratis
Mín
Máx
Fijo
Productos con características similares
Comentarios
Anthony Rios
Excelente el mejor teléfono que eh tenido
Te cambia muchísimo la perspectiva de telefonl a tablet
AnonWolf
Excelente celular, con mínimos detalles
Considero que es un excelente celular y que puedes hacer muchas cosas con el, tiene buenas pantallas, y en la productividad es excelente, sus cámaras no son las mejores pero son bastante buenas, de batería mantiene una buena duración, también es bastante resistente y tiene un buen procesador
Anonymous
dont buy fold. just after 3-4 months there were display problems. company didnot respond because its warranty for 3 months only. if display problem araises.. you have to pay 60k. better go for any other model except fold series.
Hans Paternotte
Kostbare kwetsbare prul met een beroerde garantie.
Na een Fold 3 waarvan binnen een jaar de display los liet vol verwachting een Fold 4 gekocht. Volgens Samsung stof en spatwaterdicht. Binnen drie maanden na aankoop zand in het scharnier. Ik had mijn broekzak na een bezoek aan het strand niet helemaal uitgeklopt. Direct bij openen pixelstoringen in het display. Samsung NL wilde geen garantie geven omdat men stelde dat het toestel zou zijn gevallen wat absoluut niet het geval was en ook nergens waarneembaar. Samsung Tsjechië heeft hierna het toestel wel onder garantie gerepareerd en niets vermeld over een vermeende val. Echter nu, naar zes maanden, zelfde probleem. weer zand in het scharnier en pixel uitval. Ik ga niet meer terug naar Samsung want ik hoor al weer dezelfde aanname. Nooit meer een Fold en ook nooit meer een Samsung. Kostbare kwetsbare prul. Overigens heeft een vriend van mij die tegelijk met mij de Fold 4 kocht precies hetzelfde probleem. Ook met de accu van de Fold 4 kom je met moeite de dag door.
Anonymous
I had bought Samsung galaxy Z fold 4 in January last year and it worked very well and was useful for 1st year. Then 3 months after expiry of my phone's manufacturer warranty, one day the WiFi stopped working. I looked for online help and realised it's a hardware issue. Then I headed to Samsung galaxy store. After explaining the issue briefly, the attendant smiled and replied, It will take at least one week and AED 1650 to fix the issue. This is more than 1/4th of original phone cost. I decided not to repair it until I have a spare phone. In the following week the display started flickering. Then one days I realised second SIM slot was not working and later on even the first SIM slot stopped working. Next day the front camera stopped working and few hours later the front display stopped working. The only way to use the phone was through big internal screen which also stopped working next day. Now this phone is absolutely useless with all my data not backed up because of WiFi and SIM slot issue...
When I asked for quotation from other mobile phone service centers they said this issue is very common and the screen costs a bomb with which all the other parts are connected and repairing the phone is impractical because of exorbitant costs.
When I shared this with my colleagues they advised me to put this experience in public forum for awareness. And hence this long post. Thanks for reading and avoid buying into this primitive technology.
Cooe
"The fine print starts with the fact that the main camera on the Fold4 is based on the Samsung GN3 sensor, whereas the S22s have an GN5 at the core. Both sensors have a 1/1.56" optical format, 50million 1.0µm pixels, and a Tetrapixel filter array (Quad Bayer in Sony speak).
Where the two differ is in the autofocusing - the GN5 uses Dual Pixel Pro, while the GN3 in the Fold4 relies on a slightly less sophisticated Dual Pixel method."
🤦😑 WRONG!!! The Samsung ISOCELL GN3 camera sensor used in the Galaxy Fold 4 is the newer & superior version of that sensor design to the older ISOCELL GN5 used in the S22 lineup, NOT the other way around!!! This is why the GN3 is the sensor that Samsung has continued to reuse on literally every flagship since right up to this very day (S23, Fold 4, S24), not the GN5!
If it really does have the older "Dual Pixel" instead of the "Dual Pixel Pro" autofocusing system, then that just means that Samsung either decided the latter wasn't worth using and switched back OR even more likely, you just have that backwards and it's the newer GN3 with Dual Pixel Pro support... 🤦
Cooe
"The flexible layer above the OLED pixels is still only sort of glass as far as our understanding goes, even though Samsung and the product's (most likely) supplier Schott call it UTG (Ultra-Thin Glass)."
🤦😑 Schott and soon Corning's UTG folding glass is not just "only sort of glass", it literally IS GLASS!!!! Straight up. End of story. Stop spreading misleading bulls**t misinformation please!
Just because a sheet of glass is manufactured to be so ridiculously freaking thin (specifically just 30 microns in this case) that it's flexible enough to be able to almost bend in half, DOESN'T SUDDENLY MAKE IT NOT GLASS ANYMORE!!! And the same exact thing applies to putting one or more plastic protective layers on it. You don't suddenly consider normal slab phones with plastic screen protectors on them to "no longer have glass displays" just because your finger isn't directly touching glass, do you??? O_o
No matter how thin it is, or how many layers of plastic is put on top of it, glass is still glass, is still glass. Whether something is made of glass or not has absolutely NOTHING to do with its strength/durability. It has to do with the object's material science chemistry. And UTG folding glass is most definitely made out of ACTUAL, REAL GLASS!!! And this is why it actually feels like glass under the finger! Go try an ACTUALLY plastic display like an OG Fold 1 or the 2019-2020 RAZR and the difference in finger feel and consistency will be STARKLY apparent. 🤷
Cooe
"The new, more squarish, aspect of the screen may have some minor implications on its usability (positive ones, we'd say)"
Uhh... What the hell are you even talking about???... O_o The main interior display's more wide/square aspect ratio is nothing but a NEGATIVE in terms of usability! It means bigger empty black bars when watching widescreen media in landscape and an inferior experience for scrolling through modern vertical app feeds and website layouts in portrait. In addition, the wider, squarer display also makes it harder and more uncomfortable to type if you don't use a split layout keyboard.
(Heck, due to text size limitations, you can't even really fit much more "webpage" on screen at once in most cases, with it instead simply leading to more empty unused space on the left & right side of the device when browsing!)
All that said, don't get me wrong here, the aspect ratio changes Samsung made with the Fold 4 were still COMPLETELY the right & correct call overall!!! That extra +3mm of front cover display width makes an absolutely GARGANTUAN difference to its overall usability that CANNOT BE OVERSTATED!!! ESPECIALLY for things like two hand typing!
But trying to also pretend like the internal display now being more square shaped as a result is somehow a "positive thing for usability" is absolutely freaking absurd... 🤦😑 ... Having bigger black bars and more empty unused space is literally NEVER a "positive for usability" lol. 🤷
Cooe
"The aspect ratio went from 25:9 to 23.1:9.
As those numbers strongly imply, the problem is that it's less tall by only a teeny tiny amount, and so the issue with typing on the outer screen remains"
🤦 ... What an utterly crap, absolutely nonsensical take... 😑 While a +3mm increase in display width doesn't sound like much in absolute terms, it most definitely WAS in relative terms as that's a SIGNIFICANT difference in aspect ratio! It basically cut the gap between it and a reasonably normal, ala Z Flip's, ≈22:9 aspect ratio practically in HALF!!! And the difference in day-to-day usability on that front display was legit dramatic! (I've owned & used both a Fold 3 & 4 for long periods of time.)
This is literally like saying a modern ≈19:9 phone and an old-school ≈16:9 phone's display shapes are "different by only a teeny tiny amount"... 🤦 ... 😑
Also, making the front screen even wider will turn the internal tablet display into an awful SQUARE that's garbage for BOTH watching widescreen media in landscape and scrolling through modern vertical app feeds & webpages in portrait!
That's is actually the exact problem that the OnePlus Open has. Thanks to that "normal sized/width" 20:9 front display, despite it having a SIGNIFICANTLY larger tablet display in total area, the viewable 16:9 media area on it is actually slightly SMALLER than on a Fold 4/5 simply because the screen is so ridiculously freaking square!!! (≈9:8 vs Fold 4/5's ≈6:5)