MSI TITAN 18 HX A14VHG 18" UHD PLUS INTEL CORE I9-14900HX 2.2GHZ / NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 4080 LAPTOP / 64GB RAM / 2TB SSD + 2TB SSD

NikoB

23.02.2024

4k panels for laptops cost $150 retail; if they are produced more widely, they will be even cheaper - not putting them against the price of laptops is a deliberate redneck.

Neenyah

23.02.2024

Quote from: lmao on February 23, 2024, 15:02:33 Quote from: lmao on February 23, 2024, 15:02:33 Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 This 👆

lmao

23.02.2024

Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 because you keep them close to your face and they do not cost $5K per screen

Neenyah

23.02.2024

Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 Quote from: NikoB on February 23, 2024, 14:25:22 Where is your 8K screen?

NikoB

23.02.2024

Practicality = means mental poverty, if you do not strive for the best and be content with what is given or imposed on purpose, when there is a 100% opportunity to do better. Why are people not satisfied with <200ppi on smartphones? After all, it's practical and consumes less!

lmao

22.02.2024

Quote from: NikoB on February 22, 2024, 18:55:57 Quote from: NikoB on February 22, 2024, 18:55:57 or they are smart to not waste money on 8k anything, because usual two-three 8k display setup will just smash any gpu displaying desktops and will cost unproportionally

NikoB

22.02.2024

Well, approximately 99.9% do not see cloudy fonts point-blank in modern browsers on their fhd-2.5k screens (for all screens with ppi < 220-230), although professionals see them right away. And this is a proven fact. Due to incorrect black and white antialiasing on x86 PCs/laptops. And this problem is automatically practically solved when ppi is above 250-300. Even if the anti-aliasing remains cloudy, the shadows simply become invisible, blurring the clarity of characters due to the fault of the developers of modern browsers. And I can easily demonstrate this with screenshots of any page at 400% font magnification in Chrome/Edge and Firefox with default settings.

NikoB

22.02.2024

Corrected the stupid "AI" of the Google translator. --- The majority of the population is simply stupid, their opinion does not matter in advanced things. Why should I care about their opinion given their complete technical illiteracy and blindness? Primitive thinking and outlook? What amazes me most of all is the last 9-10 years - when almost all people had smartphone screens with 250ppi+ at home. In theory, if a person is not a complete idiot, then all sorts of questions should have disappeared from him - why is there 250ppi+ on a monitor or laptop screen. I remember the times literally 5 years ago, when the same idiots shouted on the forums - why do I need 2.5k on a laptop, fhd is enough for me. And now the same idiots (literally on the same forums), having bought a model with a 2.5k screen, are delighted with how much clearer the text and graphics are there than on the wretched outdated fhd, although they had previously lamentably stated that "they don't need anything else." But at the same time, these same idiots, without any doubt, immediately categorically claim that they no longer need 4K on a laptop, although this further improves the quality of text and graphics, bringing it on laptop screens to the level of quality on smartphone screens, in terms of clarity Pictures. Although the screens of their smartphones with ppi above 300 are RIGHT in front of their eyes - the answer is why only 4k+ screens are needed on laptops. And 8k+ will do the same thing as 4k+ on laptop screens - it will give almost perfect clarity on 27-32" diagonals. Almost perfect. Everything will be completely ideal, in terms of image clarity for the eyes, at a resolution of 12-16k on 32". But as it turns out, most people are such blind idiots that even looking at the answer with their own eyes, they don't see it point blank. Well, what can I do about it? Only look with despondency at the increasing dullness of the population... Progress is promoted by scientists, engineers and civil activists - the crowd follows them, their opinion is not decisive here.

NikoB

22.02.2024

The majority of the population is simply stupid, their opinion does not matter in advanced things. Why should I care about their opinion given their complete technical illiteracy and blindness? Primitive thinking and outlook? What amazes me most of all is the last 9-10 years - when almost all people had smartphone screens with 250ppi+ at home. In theory, if a person is not a complete idiot, then all sorts of questions should have disappeared from him - why is there 250ppi+ on a monitor or laptop screen. I remember the times literally 5 years ago, when the same idiots shouted on the forums - why do I need 2.5k on a laptop, fhd is enough for me. And now the same idiots (literally on the same forums), having bought a model with a 2.5 screen, are delighted with how much clearer the text and graphics are there than on the wretched fhd. But at the same time, these same idiots, without any doubt, immediately categorically claim that 4K is not necessary, although this further improves the quality of text and graphics, bringing it on laptop screens to the level of quality on smartphone screens in terms of picture clarity. Although they have smartphone screens right in front of their eyes, the answer is why only 4k+ screens are needed on laptops. And 8k+ will do the same thing as 4k+ on laptop screens - it will give almost standard clarity on 27-32" diagonals. Almost standard. Everything will be completely standard, in terms of image clarity for the eyes, at a resolution of 12-16k on 32". But as it turns out, most people are such blind idiots that even looking at the answer with their own eyes, they don't see it point blank. Well, what can I do about it? Only look with despondency at the increasing dullness of the population...