Inicio/APPLE MACBOOK PRO (2015) 13"

APPLE MACBOOK PRO (2015) 13"
Rendimiento
Pantalla
Tarjeta grafica
Autonomía
Almacenamiento
Conectores
El más barato
Desconocido
Características APPLE MACBOOK PRO (2015) 13"
TipoIPS, LCD, LED-backlit
Densidad de pixeles227 ppi
Tamaño13.3 "
RAM8 GB
Capacidad1000 GB
Historial de precios
mín
máx
fijo
$6,114

Entrega gratis
Mín
Máx
Fijo
Comentarios
Gato Persa
No encendia
Nunca la pude encender y la tuve que devolver
Aitor piñeiro mendez
Llegó algo golpeada
Llegó con la tapa algo golpeada y se calienta un poco al utilizarla.
DreofheBay
This is a whole lot of talk regarding a laptop display. The retina look great. If you are sitting in a normal position using a 13" display it works great, Balanced color....good screen 4 K is bull and only for people who like to brag about numbers. Looking at lower res images on a 4K makes it look much worse .
Till Schönborn
The game rating refers to the subnotebook classification of the MBP 13; in other words: The 3D gaming performance is quiet decent for its class. It would be a bit unfair to rate Subnotebooks and large DTRs with the same scale in this category. :)
sh
I love this laptop, and this review is very reasonable. However, maybe you've over-rated its games performance by making it at 84%. It's almost impossible to play large games and it turns out to be a 84% score, so is there any computer on this planet which gets a score lower than 80%? What's the point of that number?
RVn
tnq for your great and containing review, Is there any body who can answer my question that whether a 128 GB SSD hard drive would be sufficient for macOSX, bootcamp, and wnidows8.1? Can any body tel me how much volume does these softwares(macOSX, bootcamp, windows8.1) take? And one last question, that can i instal some games on an external hard drive and call it back from there for playing so that i would not take my SSD hard drive volume?? I would appreciate your answers!☺️☺️
Intosh
"you can have mixed feelings whether the implementation of a 28-watt processor was really a good idea." The reason behind the choice of processor is a very calculated and systematic one, which is something that Apple is generally known for. That choice of processor allows the Macbook Pro 13 to practically claim the title of "king of the hill" when it comes to benchmarks, as your own review showed. Never mind the real world difference in performance may not be very noticeable, the numerous charts and graphs showing the Macbook Pro yielding better numbers are very good justification for a customer, who is willing to pay the premium, to choose it over another product. That is called consumer psychology. That CPU choice gives Apple a dozen of charts showing the Macbook Pro ahead, while that same CPU is directly responsible for only one bad number (the battery time under load). That's why it is a systematic and calculated choice.
tantan
I have seen another remark: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-Ultrabook-Review.138033.0.html the X1 Carbon's keyboard got 90% score in that remark which said "Overall, it's one of the best available Ultrabook keyboards by our judgment." I don't known why the macbook pro got 92%, is this means macbook has better keyboard than all Ultrabook? why there is no remark of macbook's keyboard?
af
wrg