Inicio/APPLE IPAD PRO 10.5" WIFI + CELLULAR 512GB
APPLE IPAD PRO 10.5" WIFI + CELLULAR 512GB
Rendimiento
Cámara
Autonomía
Pantalla
Almacenamiento
Diseño
El más barato
$6,243.3
No es el mejor momento
En los últimos 30 días el coste es $7.47 más caro de lo habitual
Características APPLE IPAD PRO 10.5" WIFI + CELLULAR 512GB
TipoIPS, LCD, LED-backlit
Densidad de pixeles265 ppi
Tamaño10.5 "
RAM4 GB
Capacidad512 GB
Capacidad8134 mAh
Descripción
El Apple iPad Pro de 10.5 pulgadas con conectividad WiFi + Cellular y una capacidad de almacenamiento de 512 GB es un dispositivo que se destaca principalmente por su amplia memoria interna. Esta tablet dispone de una pantalla de 10.5 pulgadas, proporcionando una calidad de visualización satisfactoria para la lectura, navegación en internet y visualización de medios.
Con 4 GB de RAM, el desempeño general del dispositivo es considerado insuficiente para aplicaciones exigentes o multitarea intensiva. Asimismo, la calidad de la cámara no cumple con las expectativas de los usuarios más exigentes, y lo mismo ocurre con la autonomía de su batería de 8134 mAh, que no ofrece un rendimiento óptimo para un uso prolongado sin recarga.
El diseño del iPad Pro podría no satisfacer a aquellos que buscan un dispositivo con un aspecto moderno y ergonómico, y con un peso de 477 gramos, su portabilidad es estándar dentro de los dispositivos de su clase. Además, la falta de capacidad de carga rápida puede ser un inconveniente para los usuarios que necesitan recuperar batería rápidamente.
En resumen, mientras que la capacidad de almacenamiento es un punto fuerte del iPad Pro de 10.5", es importante considerar los aspectos menos favorables como el rendimiento, la calidad de la cámara, la autonomía y el diseño antes de tomar una decisión de compra.
Historial de precios
mín
máx
fijo
$6,243.3
Entrega gratis
mín
máx
fijo
Comentarios
ghm
Waste of best in class CPU for a lackluster OS. "Oh no, video editors need that cpu!" Yeah they can't even go out of their video app while it's saving the video. Top user experience.
Bro
To all of the weirdos out there who think this ipad is still good - its rubbish for multitasking and therefore bad for working and gaming. Good for people who just surf the web tho.
Ps info on the specs page is wrong - my one is running iPadOS 16.3
30/01/23
Michaelflat1
Quote from: ludosodo on September 22, 2017, 14:39:54 Quote from: ludosodo on September 22, 2017, 14:39:54 It's an LCD, so the picture changes 24 times a second, meaning that there is no flicker, like on a CRT that displays images 24 times a second, the CRT scans through, drawing out each image so to speak, whereas the LCD is all at once. Hence LCD could have 1Hz and not hurt your eyes, except it only updates once a second. It does this to save power, i'll explain like this, normally screens have 60Hz, meaning 60 images are generated by GPU and sent to LCD controller, which then changes the screen 60 times per second (the bits that change). When you are viewing an image, and the screen is static, there are a lot of images being generated by the GPU that are wasteful, you could save some power not generating 60 per second, but reducing to 24 would save a lot. It doesn't fall down to 1Hz, but maybe in the future when LCD controllers can do this :P
philippe
"We will update with a comparison to the Garmin Edge 500 shortly. "... Shortly ? lol.
ludosodo
A have a question about Promotion, when you are viewing an image, the Promotion goes to 24hz. Itsn´t it bad for the eyes?
Leo Best
Could you provide numbers for read/write speeds of the NAND storage so it can be compared to the 9.7" model. Is the noted 799MB/s read or write speed?
j
Does Apple cut corner this time in using eMMC instead of NVMe for their storage solution (previous iPP iteration used NVMe) which resulted in lower storage performance? iFixit seems to strengthen this argument when outlining that iPP 10.5 64GB is using Toshiba NAND Flash Storage. It would be a shame if this assumption is true as iPPs are positioned as super premium products therefore should have the best components. Would the 256GB or 512GB have different storage solution than the 64GB one? I'm not an expert in this therefore grateful for any guidance or advice. Cheers, j
Jdorth
There is a small problem in the GPU section of the article talking about 3D mark physics A series SoCs have always scored very low in that area (it actually took a big dip going from A6 to A7) Its not related to number of cores being active (the author has written probably so I'm providing the real reason) Its due to how A series actually has a huge problem accessing random parts in memory . 3D mark even has a link about it https://www.futuremark.com/pressreleases/understanding-3dmark-results-from-the-apple-iphone-5s-and-ipad-air
Mikeven
Maybe the screen connector has a bandwidth issue, it can't surpport P3 color at 120hz, ,or for power saving,Apple set certain limit,,,,in all that is kinda disappointing .