Behoof logo

Behoof

Mejores precios en tiendas online
Catálogo de productos
search

previous
next

ACER SWIFT GO 14 SFG14-71-785V 14" INTEL CORE I7-13700H 2.4GHZ / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Rendimiento

Pantalla

Tarjeta grafica

Autonomía

Almacenamiento

Conectores

crown El más barato

Desconocido

Características ACER SWIFT GO 14 SFG14-71-785V 14" INTEL CORE I7-13700H 2.4GHZ / 16GB RAM / 512GB SSD

Tamaño14 "

RAM16 GB

Capacidad512 GB

Descripción

Sin datos

Historial de precios

mín

máx

fijo

Comentarios

notebookcheck.net

eyelay

21.04.2024

I bought a freedos laptop and installed Windows 11 myself. Quick access did not come installed, I could not find this application on the support site. There is care center and acersense, but there are no OLED-related settings in these applications, where can I download them?

notebookcheck.net

Alx24

03.02.2024

What is HDMI port maximum resolution ?

notebookcheck.net

BarryAa

29.12.2023

Quote Well, I suppose it's pretty difficult task to set the brightness above 100%. ;-)

notebookcheck.net

Ilnahro

28.12.2023

=343027&specs[]=342689]based on notebookcheck data Shouldn't the proper comparison for performance be against the 7840HS in a machine that maxes out its official sustained power at 54W? Comparing Meteor Lake against a competitor that gets to use less than half the sustained amount of power is hard to justify, though I would be curious to hear the authors reasoning. When you do use the 7840HS instead of the 7840U ( ), that convincing W of the Meteor Lake chip turns in to a tie at best and a convincing loss in most cases. Anyone can look this up on here and a comparison should have been drawn in all the benchmarks to illustrate that Intel (once again) is brute-forcing performance-parity through massively higher power consumption. Something that can be forgiven in a Desktop-PC but is absolutely critical in battery-constrained applications like laptops and gaming handhelds. The usual technical details are there, but I am pretty disappointed by the skew given to the performance analysis of this chip. It does not seem fair or representative of what users will experience in practice.

notebookcheck.net

Sergey

19.12.2023

The article is disgusting advertising. The article says that the Meteor Lake GPU is superior to the 780M, but in tests it cannot beat it even against a low-voltage processor. The article advertises an NPU, but in terms of performance it is inferior to the Meteor Lake GPU (an NPU is not needed ). There is no software available to users, which was confirmed when setting up the software. All competing H chips from both AMD and Intel have been removed from the article. To make Meteor Lake look as good as possible. The authors customized the provided equipment to make it look better, which is prohibited by testing rules.

notebookcheck.net

A

19.12.2023

Quote from: Ram on December 19, 2023, 15:18:05 Quote from: Ram on December 19, 2023, 15:18:05 Yeah, it's the same in Apple M chips, "slower but more efficient", but no one bought into it and everyone is just using GPU. Apple also adapted Stable Diffusion model back in the day but it never became a thing. GPU algorithms became more efficient with time due to research while NPU was just forgotten. The only thing using Neural Engine on Apple is OS at the moment - scans your images when asleep, figures out your battery usage patters for battery charge limiter, etc. I expect the same to happen on Windows, with more telemetry of course.

notebookcheck.net

Ram

19.12.2023

Quote from: A on December 19, 2023, 11:50:54 Quote from: A on December 19, 2023, 11:50:54 Quote from: RobertJasiek on December 19, 2023, 09:37:59 Quote from: RobertJasiek on December 19, 2023, 09:37:59 I guess the point of the NPUs, at least from the smartphones SOCs is that they are "more efficient" for those AI tasks, impacting the battery less than the GPU? Perhaps that could be an advantage in laptop SOCs? Every time I read those power management sections.... I get more and more surprised. In load the med is 64W and the max over 100W? On a laptop? It's astonishing. I'm disappointed that MTL isn't, customer-facing, as revolutionary as Intel tried to sell. However, I acknowledge it seems it's going to be the cornerstone of its strategy that COULD allow to greatly improve in the future, with the heterogenous nodes.

notebookcheck.net

Enma45

19.12.2023

It is a shame that this product did not come out with AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix in its beginnings 1 year ago it would have already been a sales success, but we do not know why Intel has briefcases paying the Large OEM manufacturers so that they do not release products with AMD when the Zen 4 Phoenix has been the best processor ever built waiting for the next generation. Many people are starting to talk about Zen 5 + RDNA 4, which they say will be twice as much as this latest Zen 4 Phoenix. I would like to see comparisons in which it was seen that the laptops had the same hardware when performing the tests except for the processor.

notebookcheck.net

A

19.12.2023

Quote from: RobertJasiek on December 19, 2023, 09:37:59 Quote from: RobertJasiek on December 19, 2023, 09:37:59 You haven't read the article? It clearly says iGPU is more powerful in AI, even with graph. Right above the flashy Stable Diffusion images, they should at least attract your attention beyond just checking out the outdated benchmarks. Apple's NPU is almost twice as fast and still everyone is using GPU for NNs, because it's even faster. Plus NPUs are limited in data format selection. Same thing here. And NPU is used by OS to... drumroll... ocr/object detection/tag your images on PC. Totally not for ad targeting wink wink.